"Different"
Judging which cut is "better" will always elicit an emotional response ("Air!" "Sparkle!" "Life!" "Warmth!", etc.).
It'd be better if you could just say "different". You can't say "better" without a frame of reference. Since you don't have a) the master tape, b) a live acoustic rendition of the song at the recording venue, there's NO WAY you can ever say anything is "better" than the other. It's just different (reminds me of a certain looney tunes internet audio forum where people claim certain releases made by a certain tape-op (er, "Audiophile Music Restoration Specialist") sound "just like the master tape" when they have never, ever been near one).
It's like when reviewers rave about the latest mega-buck tube gear... and how much better it is. Is it different sounding? Of course - it's chock full of 2nd order distortion. Is it better? Only if you think a distorted signal sounds better.